An economic study of controlled release urea and split applications of nitrogen as compared with non-coated urea under conventional and reduced tillage management.
Khakbazan, M., Grant, C.A., Finlay, G., Wu, R.G., Malhi, S.S., Selles, F., Clayton, G.W., Lupwayi, N.Z., Soon, Y.K., and Harker, K.N. (2013). "An economic study of controlled release urea and split applications of nitrogen as compared with non-coated urea under conventional and reduced tillage management.", Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 93(3), pp. 523-534. doi : 10.4141/CJPS2012-107 Access to full text
To evaluate the use of controlled-release urea (CRU) as a beneficial management practice for nitrogen management of wheat, barley, and canola, a multi-location study was conducted from 2004 to 2006 in a range of agro-environments across western Canada. The objective was to evaluate the relative economic performance of CRU and non-coated urea (NCU) for their effects on seed yield and quality, costs and net revenue (NR) using conventional tillage (CT) and reduced tillage (RT) management under varying environmental conditions. The NR was estimated as the income remaining after paying for all cash costs, ownership costs on machinery and buildings, and labour. The main factor affecting crop yield and NR was N application rate. In general, application of NCU produced similar or higher net revenues than that of CRU, split fertilizer applications or a blend of NCU and CRU. There were some limited situations where the use of split applications, CRU or CRU in a blend with the NCU increased crop yield as compared with NCU; however, the increased yield was not sufficient to cover the extra costs of CRU or the split application. The impact of tillage system on crop yield and NR was not consistent. Net revenue was higher under CT than RT for certain crops in some regions, but not in all regions or for all crops. Overall, NR analysis indicated that use of CRU did not provide an economic benefit over the use of NCU.
Report a problem on this page
- Date modified: