Archived content - An Alternative Strategy for Lygus Management in Ontario Strawberries
Archived content is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
The tarnished plant bug (TPB), Lygus lineolaris (Fig. 1), is a major concern in strawberry production areas across Ontario and until now, intensive use of insecticides has been the only means of control. Tarnished plant bug adults and nymphs feed on all parts of the plant by sucking sap, destroying embryos within seeds and preventing fruit tissue growth beneath the seed. The resulting misshapen berries are known as
"cat-faced" and are unmarketable (Fig. 2). In Ontario Lygus goes through two full generations and a partial third generation per year in southern Ontario and has adverse impacts on strawberry production throughout the growing season: first generation nymphs cause severe economic damage to June bearing cultivars, while second-generation nymphs are the major limiting factor on later dayneutral cultivars.
The high risk of Lygus populations developing resistance to insecticides, concerns about the impact of insecticides on beneficial insects, pollinators and human health, and increasing competition with imported berries from the USA, Mexico, China and eastern Europe have driven a search for new control strategies for these plant bugs based on no, or only limited use of, conventional pesticides.
2 IPM Concept for Tarnished Plant Bug Control in Strawberries
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) and Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) established the Pesticide Risk Reduction Program together with industry and the Canadian provinces in 2003 with the aim of reducing the risks to the environment and consumers from pesticides used in agriculture. As part of this program an IPM strategy for Lygus in Ontario strawberries has been developed by CABI Europe-Switzerland in 2006 in collaboration with Canadian partners in OMAFRA, AAFC and the University of Guelph. The IPM strategy combines trap cropping, classical biological control and a reduced risk approach using chemical control:
- Trap crops such as alfalfa planted along the edges of, or within, strawberry fields have the potential to limit plant bug damage by offering the pest a food source they prefer to the strawberry crop itself: Lygus adults migrating from adjacent areas are concentrated in the trap crop and numbers of adults migrating into strawberry are reduced. Alfalfa had earlier been identified as the most effective trap crop for Lygus bugs in California.
- At conventional strawberry farms insecticides are applied to the trap crop after adult migration, reducing the number of Lygus females before they start laying eggs. This way the number of developing nymphs, which cause the main damage, is reduced and the need for insecticide applications in the strawberry crop itself is avoided. On organic farms, where insecticide use is prohibited, the alfalfa strips need to be partially cut and removed as soon as the Lygus adults have laid most of their eggs.
- When small Lygus nymphs are present, a classical biological control agent, the European nymphal parasitoid Peristenus digoneutis Fig. 3), is released to further reduce the Lygus populations in the strawberry growing area.
3 Capacity Building
To exchange background information about organization and management of Ontario strawberry farms, TPB pest biology and alternative control options farmer participatory workshops (FPW) were held in 2006 at central locations in southwestern and eastern Ontario. At each FPW an overview presentation was made to describe the life cycle of TPB, its movement into the strawberry crop, and how the parasitoids interact with TPB and the surrounding habitats. In following discussions, farmers were selected for the study. Since there are also several organic strawberry growers in Ontario, it was determined that these growers would be the most open to new methods for managing their pest problems, and thus they were included into the study.
By presenting to the growers information on the biology of TPB and how the parasitoid Peristenus digoneutis contributes to pest mortality, capacity was built to help growers make decisions about how their crop might be best managed using biological control. Growers became knowledgeable about the problem and how a biologically based solution could help. Discussion of constraints for individual growers allowed to better design a unique management strategy for each operation. For example, the location, type and size of a trap/refuge crop depended on the land available.
After each field season, a
'farmer participant report template' was developed to provide growers with an individualized summary of results on their farm and points for follow up at on-site discussions before the next growing season. At the end of the project a questionnaire was developed to assess the growers' responses to the IPM program.
4 IPM Implementation in Ontario
The field implementation of the IPM strategy in Ontario was started in 2007 and has continued in 2008. Together with participating farmers, augmentative field releases of European biological control agent Peristenus digoneutis were conducted at two sites in southwestern Ontario [Simcoe region] and one site in eastern Ontario [Kingston region] in 2007 and 2008 (Fig. 4). In total, 8,880 mated females were released directly into trap crops adjacent to strawberry fields. Monitoring forLygusand parasitism was then conducted throughout the field season in the crop, trap crop, and surrounding weedy areas (Fig. 5). At the same time, damage in the strawberry crop was monitored to assess the impact of the IPM strategy.
5 Results of IPM Implementation
In Eastern Ontario, neither pesticide applications nor inoculative releases of the biocontrol agent Peristenus digoneutis in 2007 prevented TPB population to increase at all sites in 2008 (Fig. 6). This increase was likely caused by a lower overwintering mortality of TPB adults in winter 2007/8. Remarkably, in 2008 the parasitoid was also recorded at sites where it was never released before, indicating that it is widely established throughout Eastern Ontario. Data from 2008 show clearly that with increasing TPB densities, parasitism by Peristenus digoneutis increases as well (Fig. 6). This agrees with former observations in the US, showing that the parasitoid reacts positively to increasing TPB densities. An area-wide increase of TPB parasitism has not yet resulted in significant reduction of TPB populations in Eastern Ontario, but it is expected in the longer term. In Southern Ontario, no uniform development of TPB populations was observed in 2008 (Fig. 7). As in Eastern Ontario, parasitism levels followed TPB densities. At the organic strawberry site, where TPB densities dropped in 2008, parasitism declined as well. The opposite trend was observed at the conventional strawberry site, where parasitism increased with TPB densities. TPB damage difference between 2007 and 2008 at conventional strawberry farms both increases and decreased on the site, likely due to different management techniques from previous years (Fig. 8). In contrast, berry damage remained constant between years at both the organic farms participating in the IPM program. Overall, three growers did not apply any pesticides and another farm substantially reduced pesticide input in 2008 compared with previous years.
6 Conclusions and Future Perspectives
The current distribution of P. digoneutis in Canada shows that the parasitoid is now well established in eastern Ontario in parts of southern Ontario. In the northeastern United States, it took almost ten years before a significant impact of P. digoneutis was recognized and Lygus populations collapsed. Thus, it is hoped that a continuous growth of P. digoneutis populations Ontario will have a similar long-term effect and lead to an area wide reduction of the pest. This also suggests that ongoing work to encourage population build up and assess impact is needed. In addition, surveys in other parts of Ontario would help to identify areas where the parasitoid is not yet present, and releases would help to accelerate the dispersion and establishment of P. digoneutis
About the Pesticide Risk Reduction Program at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
The Pesticide Risk Reduction Program delivers viable solutions for Canadian growers to reduce pesticide risks in the agricultural and agri-food industry. In partnership with the Pest Management Regulatory Agency of Health Canada (PMRA), the Program achieves this goal by coordinating and funding integrated pest management strategies developed through consultation with stakeholders and pest management experts.
The Pesticide Risk Reduction Program is actively pursuing the development and implementation of strategies which are key to reducing pesticide risks in the agricultural environment. To view our program's current priorities and the issues being addressed, visit the Pest Management Centre website.
- Date modified: